How Social Networks Predicted Obama's Win
I wrote a column way back in March suggesting that social networks might be the best predictor of who will win the presidency. Remember, this is back before each party had even nominated its candidate, and the field was wide open. Hillary Clinton was the expected Democratic nominee, for example. At the time, I conducted an analysis that varied from site to site, and included Digg, MySpace and Facebook, to see which of the candidates the social sites preferred. I also suggested that if social sites ended up accurately predicting who would win, they might be taken seriously by future pundits when guesstimating who is likely to be elected in the future. Back then, as you can read in my article, SOCIAL SITES PREDICTED A LANDSLIDE BY OBAMA.





Comments:
considering that social networks were only available for 1 presidential election, I don't think your statements have any solid grounding. You just happened to have the good side of a coin toss.
also, the elections weren't a landslide victory. in terms of electoral votes, yes. but popularity was pretty much even with a little bit more people leaning towards obama.
Did you forget about Ron Paul?
I think you're on to something Mike.
Obama got the youth vote via social networks, no doubt about it.
Unfortunately, I don't think this social network phenom is necessarily a good thing (when applied to politics) from all the various postings I reviewed as the process progressed over the last several months.
I think it's an mtv type phenomenon in that much of what was being posted was ill informed opinion being twittered/blogged/facebooked by people who don't look any further to find out the truth and only want to be involved for the short time it takes to regurgitate a sound bite.
I ride 2 trains to work (both of which have quite a few students on them as well as a lot of business types) so I get a chance to hear a bit of the "buzz" from all races/ages/walks of life and in listening to many (esp. the young) discuss the election (pre-vote) I found it unbelievable the "sound bite" type things they mistook for the truth (on both sides) I rarely heard them talking about further research/investigation into what the real truth was/is regarding some of the things being said about both Barack Obama and John McCain as well as the various props etc.
Unfortunately, I've already seen many, many hateful/biased and irrational exchanges (instead of respectful debate) in the social/blogshpere just in one day.
"Buzz" is not a good substitute for knowledge, research and a rational thought process.
Buzz is great for marketing a product but how often does the "buzz" actually play out as a good thing long term?
My sincere hope is that the this spark that has the youth of our country (and people in general) interested in politics continues to grow and that they pay attention now to what both parties actually execute in the days/years ahead.
Rich
***** Obama got the youth vote via social networks, no doubt about it. *****
The average or median age of most social networks is 35. That online = youth is a myth.
Success on social networks may imply two things: 1) genuine popularity; and 2) successful "marketing" by the campaign. Both those things may get people elected.
Mike
Even an idiot could predict Obama will win and you think you're special.
Post a Comment
<< Home